The re-shaping of the traditional professions continues as chartered
surveyors voted overwhelmingly in favour of radical plans to modernise
the property profession. The 130 year old RICS plans to turn itself into
a "dynamic, business-led organisation offering enhanced support to
members."
The RICS says it will have a stronger voice with government, business
and the wider community, raise educational standards, and foster better
links at local, national and international levels.
Radical change it may be but only 31% of the 75,000 members eligible to
vote turned out - apparently the highest percentage on record. Of those
voting 86.5% supported the proposed changes.
Welcoming the vote, RICS president Simon Kolesar said: "Major change
in any democratic professional organisation is exceptionally hard to bring
about. We have developed an ambitious and far-reaching, yet balanced,
programme which the membership has judged for itself and for which it
has delivered a very strong mandate.
"The time for introspection and internal debate is now over. We must
all get on with the job of making the New RICS work, which means raising
the status of this great profession of ours. Of all the professions, chartered
surveyors are now in the strongest position to contribute to solving many
of the major challenges facing governments and business across the world."
Nearly two years in the planning, the main features of the reformed RICS
will be:
- renewed concentration on raising the status of the profession by
improving educational and professional standards and training
- the replacement of the seven existing divisions with 16 specialism-led
faculties that better reflect the realities of client demand
- the establishment of national associations, territories and regions
to recognise the growing internationalisation of the chartered surveying
profession on the one hand and of devolution within the UK on the other.
- the provision of relevant and targeted business and practice information
for members, making increasing use of electronic communication.
Richard Byatt
|